Microsoft Studios Games
Microsoft Studios Games
Will Physics be the next Big Thing in PC Gaming?
Realism has been a driving force behind gaming, but games themselves are nothing without the hardware they run on. Without graphics cards we would not be able to experience the immersive virtual worlds we have been spoiled with. There is however a problem with realism; its very resource intensive.
The more game developers try to create more realistic worlds the more current technology is pushed to its limit. If you ask average Joe what realism in gaming is all about they would probably tell you about the graphics, but any gamer knows graphics are nothing if the world they render is skin deep. This is where physics comes into play. Physics have been present in games in some form since the start. Take Pong for example; two paddles on each side of the screen bounce a ball between them, if the ball lands at a certain angle with the paddle going at a certain speed then the resulting bounce will be relative to those variables.
Physics is actually a lot simpler than any explanation can make it, the simplest way to describe how game physics should work is by looking at the real world. This is what game developers have been doing for years; trying to bring real world to the virtual.
Cry Havok
There are two elements to game physics; namely the hardware and the engine. There are two main physics engines at present, these are Havok and PhysX. Havok's physics engine is unsurprisingly designed by Havok, it was first released back in 2000 and is currently on its 6th version which was released in August 2008. Havok has been used in over 200 game titles; these include Company of Heroes, Soul Calibur IV, and the upcoming StarCraft II and Diablo III. Havok is released to developers (after they pay a license fee of course) as a Software Development Kit also known as an SDK. This SDK allows developers to use the engine in all aspects of their game that require physics. Havok physics is in fact such a successful engine that it has been integrated into the PlayStation, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3, PSP Nintendo Wii, and the Xbox 360.
Havok's success has been due to its easy implementation not only by game designers but also by movie studios. Havok proudly lists on its site a few on the movies that the Havok physic SDK has been used on, this list includes 10.000BC, X-Men: The Last Stand, and Troy. Havok also quotes on their site the numerous compliments that its engines have received from some of the major development studios. These studios include LucasArts, Bungie Studios, Bethesda Studios, Midway, and Irrational Games.
The competition to Havok is PhysX. PhysX was the start of all the physics commotion. Ageia burst onto the scene touting their new hardware and engine as the greatest thing since sliced bread, unfortunately some people believed them. Not long after the launch of the Ageia PhysX card and the accompanying SDK in 2006 game developers quickly started incorporating the engine into their games.
One of the most notable games at the time was Tom Clancy's Advanced Warfighter. Ironically Havok claimed that Warfighter used the Havok engine. While Havok was not hardware dependent and therefore could run on any system configuration, PhysX was proprietary and therefore coded to run on specific hardware, namely the Ageia PhysX card. In the beginning the hardware was the Ageia PhysX card but since Nvidia's buy out of Ageia all CUDA enabled Nvidia graphics cards are capable of utilizing the PhysX SDK. A few gentlemen on the internet have however hacked drivers and have gotten PhysX to run on a couple of HD4870's.
PhysX has an impressive list of titles under its belt but before the take-over by Nvidia there was very little reason to warrant the purchase of an expensive Physics Processing Unit (PPU). The frame rate hit in the beginning was a shock to some, but after a few tweaks there was new hope for the foundling tech. Unfortunately in the long run, a frame rate boost was too little too late and hardly the point of the PPU, namely to provide more interaction in the virtual world without any performance degradation.
Since the acquisition of Ageia by Nvidia there has been hope for those who wanted a PPU and were unable to afford one. Nvidia released CUDA, which takes advantage of the unified architecture of the 8-series and all subsequent series GPUs and allows the system to use the processing capabilities of the GPU in a more general application such as physics. This approach turns the GPU into a GPGPU (GenerahPurpose processing on Graphics Processing Unit). What this basically means is that if you have a few clock cycles to spare then why not throw some more calculations at the GPU and score a more realistic environment because of it. That would be the Utopian idea, however the facts are that if you want PhysX to work on your Nvidia GPU then you best have at least two of them.
AMD, the swing vote...
With the acquisition of Ageia by Nvidia and Havok by Intel, AMD was left to decide which side it wanted to fight on and in this case they chose the devil they knew. It seems that AMD prefer Havok even though Nvidia made PhysX an open standard in March 2008. While AMD has its own SDK available this is more for its own FireStream cards which are not targeted at the consumer market but rather high performance computing sectors such as medical and finance.
AMD and Intel have been working on improved implementations of Havok on the hardware level; this alone should be a statement of epic proportions. Does Nvidia's PhysX really stand a chance if both of the largest microprocessor manufacturers are supporting the competition? AMD's decision to stick with Havok is probably due to Havok's maturity as an engine, and that it was more ‘open' than PhysX, which kept in line with AMD's market strategy. AMD has said that it sees no reason to switch to PhysX at this point but as true to form they didn't deny the future potential.
Newton's four horsemen
The simulation of real world Newtonian physics is a partnership between hardware and software. While the SDKs and APIs can pass the information onto the hardware, the hardware itself must be capable of handling the immense calculations required to provide this realism factor. In the world of physics hardware there are four options; namely: Ageia, Nvidia, AMD, and Intel. Ageia is now redundant thanks to Nvidia, who AMD are copying while Intel is reinventing the wheel.
An interesting state of affairs when considering that Havok is for now limited to CPUs. Fear not though for as you read this, very smart people are punching away at their keyboards, hammering out code that will move current Havok calculations from the CPU to the GPU changing the landscape once again and justifying AMD working so closely with the Havok team.
So where does Intel fall into the picture? Well the answer is two-fold. Firstly as owners of Havok they benefit from AMD's interest and support, having a major GPU player supporting your software is just the kind of support that a company needs when their competition is in a similar situation. AMD GPUs are present in two of the three major gaming consoles. It is this pressure that might see developers adopt Havok instead of PhysX.
Larrabee all that you can be
Intel's upcoming GPU, Larrabee is rumored to be the next big thing in GPU design. Intel has designed Larrabee from the ground up to be a GPU based on the x86 instruction set. What this means is instead of simplistic stream processors found in current GPUs, Larrabee will be hypothetically 8, 16 or 32 CPU cores speculatively based on the new Core 17 fab process. These CPU cores are all based on the old Pentium design and even though they have been updated to support x86-64 are unable to achieve out-of-order execution. Since these are CPU cores they would require an entirely new approach to graphics meaning that while GPUs are trying to be CPUs, the opposite is also taking place. Larrabee is based on x86 CPUs. This will make the transition for Havok a lot smoother as it currently works on the same platform. Intel has hinted that Larrabee will be capable of the absurdly illusive art of real-time Ray Tracing amongst others, something GPUs have never been powerful enough to achieve. Details are still sketchy but the graphics world is holding its breath to see if a multi-core CPU can be a GPU and if so, what API it would use.
Long story short, if they get it right, Intel will have the hardware capable of doing physics calculations and thanks to their acquisition of Havok they will be laughing all the way to the bank if Larrabee is launched capable of GPU and PPU tasks.
How will the Apple Fall?
Things are not as cut and dry as they appear. Information is sketchy regarding some deals but it seems that AMD could have also adopted PhysX. The challenge that developers face is whether they should code for Havok or PhysX; this little choice could spell disaster for both. Some speculate that developers could start calling for Microsoft to write a physics API into DirectX because supporting a single universal API is easier than supporting two. An API war could see one side, or even both, making their API fully open in an attempt to lure developers and make it a standard.
This sort of competition is good for consumers in the long run but unfortunately will leave early adopters cursing if it doesn't go in their favor. Whichever way you slice it, physics is still young, and like graphics of old, requires time to mature. Hopefully in a year or two the future of physics will be a clear path and consumers can spend their hard earned money on technology that they can actually use.
About the Author
For all your computer requirements visit us at http://usacomputers.rr.nu and http://sacomputers.rr.nu
Are Maya and Z-brush compatible with microsoft visual studio for making games?
Maya and Z-brush for making models to put in the game? and could you make a complete game with those 3 things?
I'm not sure about visual basic, but for c++ and c# it should work, although i'm not sure how to import them in. I know that both of those languages are compatible with 3-d graphics. But I don't know how any of it works. Look up information about your libraries and see what you can turn up.
Microsoft Studios Games
Best Video Game Company Ever
Produce Your own Video Game Today
The passion for video games is 1 that has to be experienced to be really understood. It's not surprising when dedicated players decide to produce their own video games simply because they've a clear understanding of what they like in a game and what they don't. Do you too share a passion to excel inside the virtual world of video games? Would you like to create your own video game? There is lots of assist at hand on the internet to assist video game players of all ages to experiment with creating a game of their own.
Basics to Produce Your personal Video Game
In the event you ask a group of game players what is the single most important factor in a effective game they will all most likely uncover it tough to agree on any single factor. While some believe that it's the story line that makes a video game unique other people really feel it is the manner in which the gameplay is designed, whilst still others focus on the special effects that have been included in the game.
To create your personal video game it is a great idea to first decide what you find most fascinating in your favorite video games and begin from there. Most game players are clear about what they believe a video game lacks and your video game gives you an opportunity to produce what you think is a complete video game.
Once you might have a wonderful story line and characters in mind you would need to determine on the look and feel of the world in which your video game is set. Keep in mind the much more life like the virtual world the more absorbed the players grow to be in it.
For inspiration and guidance for the style of storytelling you'll discover various resources on the internet that can support you refine your narrative technique. Next you have to create the graphics for the video game and this could be completed fairly easily utilizing the varied software accessible for this extremely purpose. Most of these are free to download online and you should consider a few of them prior to you make up your mind.
If you do not wish to sketch out characters and textures for scenes you can use the pre-made ones that will be downloaded free of price from the world wide web. Two dimensional graphics are needed to produce a three D affect as well as the background scenery should also match the look and feel of the video game. Depending on your level of understanding of software you should choose one that greatest suits your project.
Software to Assist Produce Your own Video Game
Beginners and children, you are able to try to produce your own video game by utilizing one of the software offered for those that have little knowledge of programming and graphics but have the interest and passion for video games. The Games Factory is a great place to start making your first video game whilst learning a few of the principles of the procedure. Merely drag and drop the features you would like included inside your game. Stagecast Creator is also a fantastic tool for children who want to make their own video game. Just draw or import your characters and indicate what you want them to do along with the software takes care of the rest. This software creates terrific 2D video game that it is possible to play and share with friends.
For players with a little more experience with games and relevant software, and are interested in 3D video games try Reality Factory, where you are able to develop the whole world of your video game from the blueprint upwards. It is possible to pick to use existing textures or create your personal for your virtual world. You can find a number of tutorials for Reality Factory that clarify all aspects of the software. It's totally free and effortless to download and provides developers a wonderful understanding of the script, models, affects, etc.
For those who are considering a career in game development and have a good understanding of the procedure involved software like DarkBasic is recommended. Working on it'll offer you a great understanding of the programming needed for video games. As for professionals, you can't do greater than C++ and Microsoft Direct X.
Microsoft XNA Game Studio Express permits Windows XP users to download it totally free and produce video games on it. Soon developers on this system is going to be able to produce, test and share their video games for the Xbox Three-Sixty.
Whether or not you're a beginner to gaming, an avid fan or a professional creating a video game of your personal is the most satisfying experience, one that's sure to motivate you to create far more games.
About the Author
More about cheap video games online,visit at cheap video games online
Microsoft Studios Games
